Subcategories

• Introduce yourself
  10
  Topics
  35
  Posts

  

  @last19digitsofpi Hey Last19digitsofpi. (8473645284273355832 if I remember correctly?)

  Welcome. Glad you come in peace. Peace is good, so don't be stirring the shit. 🙂

  Kidding. Precinct summability has some practical value I suppose, but other things are far more important. I'm not all that into PR but others obviously are. (I tend to think that improving single winner methods is a lower hanging fruit, at least in the US)

  My big emphasis is "voting on voting methods" (eat our own dogfood, create consensus, etc) and creating useful Codepens for tabulating and visualizing. So if you know javascript, then double-welcome!

• Electoral Theory 101
  5
  Topics
  7
  Posts

  

  Thanks, makes sense, that is what I thought regarding the term Copeland winner.

  I admit I find it odd that, given how important Condorcet and the emphasis on pairwise wins is in voting theory, that this simple concept (candidates with the most pairwise wins, whether singular or multiple candidates) doesn't have a commonly used term or terms to refer to it.

• Resources

  Link groups, pages, articles, etc.

  2
  Topics
  5
  Posts

  

  @keith-edmonds OK, I made a page for it here. https://electowiki.org/wiki/Voting_Theory_Forum

• Forum Policy
  8
  Topics
  29
  Posts

  J

  If you notice that the forum is down, or the home page, or the archive, please alert me by writing to me at zmrec2mqd9 ayut snkmail daht kahm. Please write this address down now, because in case the forum crashes, you shan't be able to reread it hence.

  If anyone is willing and able to back me up in supporting the server, please send me your public key that you use with SSH. If you tend to use PUTTY, please research how to convert your public key for use on Linux. Please take care not to send your private key.