Not only that, Felix's ID is 1.

@Psephomancy Yeah, maybe I should try installing those plugins. I guess they won't break it.

Yes this is what I want. Thanks!

Kristofer set up a browseable archive:

https://munsterhjelm.no/km/yahoo_lists_archive/

The forums I've archived have at least one message with at least one of
the terms "center squeeze", "Condorcet", "d'Hondt", "favorite betrayal",
"monotonicity", "Range voting", "Ranked Pairs", Sainte Lague", "Schulze
method" or "Score voting".

The browseable parts have the /web/ foldername:

https://munsterhjelm.no/km/yahoo_lists_archive/sd-2/web/2005-April/by-date.html

https://munsterhjelm.no/km/yahoo_lists_archive/sd-2/web/2005-April/msg00013.html

@Jack-Waugh I found the setting and just did it! I can and will change it back though. This can be something we talk about at the next meeting since it's not an urgent need. I can see pros and cons both ways.

This is achieved.

So far as I know, this is resolved.

I believe this is resolved.

@rob said in Codepens:

So it is installed? Do I just do this?

Yes, you do.

@jack-waugh There is the category "Voting Methods", which splits into "Single-winner" and "Multi-winner", but "New Voting Methods and Variations" isn't similarly split, which seems asymmetrical. But I'm not sure if the new and existing methods need to be split from each other anyway.

@jack-waugh Glad you like. i remember doing rounded corners the hard way before "border radius" was supported in browsers, but its been at least 15 years.

I was pretty happy with the angled text trick, which was added to browsers after my first implementation of this matrix long ago. That one is: transform: translate(11px, 30px) rotate(300deg);

@rob said in Testing.... voting widget plugin dev:

@rob from my phone

blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah [ballots "color":"#f50", "bgColor": "#cdf"]

@jack-waugh Is there some reason you are particularly concerned? Seems like it would be easy enough to uninstall if there are problems. Given the low number of active users I wouldn't worry that much about the risk. It appears to be a simple plug in, the vast bulk of the work being done by katex.js.

https://github.com/belst/nodebb-plugin-latex/blob/master/library.js

@toby-pereira I imagine that this forums users would not be happy with a tool that only allowed Plurality!

My hope is that the code the Equal Vote Software Dev team is working on will be able to be used for that. Right now the beta version is almost done and it currently supports Plurality, Approval, STAR, RCV, Ranked Robin, and STAR-PR. We're working on visual design and word-smithing now.