Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • C

      Direct Independent Condorcet Validation
      Single-winner • • cfrank

      12
      0
      Votes
      12
      Posts
      73
      Views

      C

      @jack-waugh exactly, that's the kind of thing I'm considering. Now I'm kind of puzzled though about whether a head-to-head between two winners of clone-independent methods can fail independence of clones. I actually don't think it's possible that the composite system fails independence of clones. FYI my preference for a Condorcet method would be Tideman's Bottom 2 Runoff (B2R), which I'm now certain is equivalent to BNR. For example, we could even pit the Approval winner against the B2R winner head-to-head. That would be a form of Approval-seeded Llull with a final independent head-to-head.

    • kodos

      New users cannot comment on posts?
      Meta Discussion • • kodos

      5
      1
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      72
      Views

      T

      @kodos I also have admin powers but wasn't aware this was a thing either. But I've just looked at the user list in the admin section and it seems that you have no e-mail address by your name. That could be the problem. It might be worth trying to add an e-mail address to your account. I think you'll then need to verify it by clicking on a link that gets e-mailed to you or something.

    • C

      Community-Driven Policy and Voting Platform Development
      Tech development • • cfrank

      2
      1
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      40
      Views

      J

      https://forby.io/

    • C

      Bottom N and Bottom 2 Runoffs are Equivalent
      Single-winner • • cfrank

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      14
      Views

      No one has replied