Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Multiwinner vs. Single-winner

    Request for Features
    4
    5
    332
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jack Waugh last edited by

      I don't know how this distinction fell by the wayside. What if "Voting Method Discussion" with its three subtopics were replaced with two top-level topics with the same three subtopics, "Multiwinner Methods" and "Single-winner Methods"?

      Approval-ordered Llull (letter grades) [10], Score // Llull [9], Score, STAR, Approval, other rated Condorcet [8]; equal-ranked Condorcet [4]; strictly-ranked Condorcet [3]; everything else [0].

      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • T
        tec @Jack Waugh last edited by

        @Jack-Waugh, I think that would be welcome.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • nealmcb
          nealmcb last edited by

          Yes, please split it! I had the same thought.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            Jack Waugh last edited by

            The single/multi split was there all along. It just wasn't obvious to me because the table of categories only shows a certain number of levels of detail, until you nose in.

            Approval-ordered Llull (letter grades) [10], Score // Llull [9], Score, STAR, Approval, other rated Condorcet [8]; equal-ranked Condorcet [4]; strictly-ranked Condorcet [3]; everything else [0].

            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              Toby Pereira @Jack Waugh last edited by

              @jack-waugh There is the category "Voting Methods", which splits into "Single-winner" and "Multi-winner", but "New Voting Methods and Variations" isn't similarly split, which seems asymmetrical. But I'm not sure if the new and existing methods need to be split from each other anyway.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post