Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Is there any difference between ways of counting Borda?

    Single-winner
    2
    2
    50
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Psephomancy
      Psephomancy last edited by

      I've heard of three different ways to count Borda-like ballots

      • "each one receives n – 1 points for a first preference, n – 2 for a second, and so on"
      • "As Borda proposed the system, each candidate received one more point for each ballot cast than in tournament-style counting, eg. 4-3-2-1 instead of 3-2-1-0"
      • Sum up the rankings themselves and elect the candidate with the lowest sum

      I've always assumed these are exactly equivalent, and will always elect the same candidate with a given set of ballots, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something. Are they the same even in cases where incomplete rankings are allowed, and in cases where equal rankings are allowed?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • T
        Toby Pereira last edited by

        Well, it partly depends on what you do with equal ranks or incomplete ballots. If an unranked candidate is scored as 0 then a 4-3-2-1 system would be different from 3-2-1-0. But if it's done in a more sensible way, they would be equivalent.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • First post
          Last post