Navigation

    Voting Theory Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Polarization and Game theory

    Political parties
    pol-parties
    2
    3
    253
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      Keith Edmonds last edited by Marylander

      I found this great review of the social dynamics at work in partisanship and polarization.

      Youtube Video

      She covers a lot of literature and keeps it fairly neutral taking shots at both sides. It really only covers the USA but I would expect the core findings to apply to all peoples.

      I have been asked many times why I think that Single Member Plurality is better than Party List. This is essentially why. In SMP you at least get the illusion of being able to vote for a person. Partisan systems like party list prime the voter to think in terms of in-group vs out-group from the onset. Sure Duverger's law means that SMP will degrade to something like this eventually but it will never be as bad in terms of negative voting.

      This is why voter choice and expression is so important. Given that the act of voting for somebody is so psychologically powerful we want people to actually be able to express themselves. If we force voters to act out polarization it leads to polarization.

      Even when we are talking about PR systems this matters. People will often think that something like MMP is good enough because it gets PR and has some regional representation. However, the ballot still uses choose one and is therefor unfit for use for the reasons in the video.

      rob 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rob
        rob Banned @Keith Edmonds last edited by

        @Keith-Edmonds Interesting subject matter but I wouldn't call it neutral (I picked up a strong right-wing libertarian bias). It seemed like she was trying to be a bit stealthy about it.

        Long video....well over an hour. Some interesting stuff in there though.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Keith Edmonds last edited by

          Yes, I picked up on the same. I did say fairly neutral. I did not get the impression this was propaganda or misrepresentations.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • First post
            Last post