FairVote claims that "RCV" doesn't have a spoiler problem. It most blatantly does.
FairVote claims that your ballot will help your 2nd choice if your 1st choice doesn't win. False, & FairVote knows that.
FairVote says that it isn't known whether Condorcet has a spoiler-problem.
No, actually MinMax(wv), & then Smith//MinMa(wv) were introduced 35 years ago, & their strategy-properties were well studied & well-known at the time. It was known even then, that the wv Condorcet methods, which also include Schuilze & RP(wv) meet Minimal-Defense, & that truncation by only one faction can't take the win from a CW.
Those things have been well known among Condorcetists for 35 years. No, Condorcet(wv) doesn't have a spoiler problem,
But FairVote has a dishonesty problem.