<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Stable Voting]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not sure what it is - but I never heard this term before - hence posting it here:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://stablevoting.org" rel="nofollow ugc">https://stablevoting.org</a></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://github.com/voting-tools/stablevoting-backend" rel="nofollow ugc">https://github.com/voting-tools/stablevoting-backend</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/411/stable-voting</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:06:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/411.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:51:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stable Voting on Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:31:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/uid/21">@masiarek</a></p>
<p dir="auto">Condorcet method, so the main thing (in my view) to look out for is whether or not its cycle-resolving rule makes it immune to turkey-raising or not.<br />
I've heard that a few Condorcet methods are immune to turkey-raising but I don't have more info about this.<br />
Perhaps, in the event of a false Condorcet cycle generated by tactical voting, the smallest-margin victory will always belong to the "turkey".</p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/post/2810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/post/2810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:former_user]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:31:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>