<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with second choice]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with second choice]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/tags/second choice</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:28:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/tags/second choice.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:57:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Problems with vote-discarding thresholds, esp in MMP]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">That's the same idea the German NGO Mehr Demokratie <a href="https://www.redondo.org/depts/city_clerk/election_info/election_results.asp" rel="nofollow ugc">proposes</a>. I <a href="http://zustimmungswahl.de/aktion-petition-btw.html" rel="nofollow ugc">proposed</a> a similar modification to MMP that uses approval voting for the direct mandate and multi party choice. The party vote is distributed equally among all approved parties, then all parties that don't reach the threshold are excluded and the vote is distributed equally among the remaining parties.<br />
It has the same effect as a second choice, but with the added benefit that voters don't have to limit their vote to one party.</p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/161/problems-with-vote-discarding-thresholds-esp-in-mmp</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/161/problems-with-vote-discarding-thresholds-esp-in-mmp</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casimir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:57:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>