<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with negative-voting]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with negative-voting]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/tags/negative-voting</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:47:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/tags/negative-voting.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:32:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Negative Score Voting]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/uid/196">@k98kurz</a> <a href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/3-2-1_voting" rel="nofollow ugc">3-2-1 Voting</a> comes to mind for a method which uses a proper negative vote in the form of a "reject" option which is treated differently</p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/506/negative-score-voting</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/506/negative-score-voting</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaptain5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:32:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>