<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Electoral Theory 101]]></title><description><![CDATA[Electoral Theory 101]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/category/10</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:06:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/category/10.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:24:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Pairwise Matrix &#x2F; Preference &#x2F; Ranked Pairs &#x2F; Cardinal pairwise]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/uid/9">@cfrank</a> said in <a href="/forum/post/2764">Pairwise Matrix / Preference / Ranked Pairs / Cardinal pairwise</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Cardinals are ordinals with an enriched structure, since in addition to ordering they have some sort of “difference magnitude” structure.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is the answer. You can rank three candidates 1, 2, 3 but give them scores (out of 10) of 10, 1, 0. So that tells you more than just your ranking.</p>
<p dir="auto">Obviously in real life elections, there's debate about the meaning of the scores and whether they're just used as a strategical device rather than a genuine measure of preference difference, but that's for another day.</p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/401/pairwise-matrix-preference-ranked-pairs-cardinal-pairwise</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/401/pairwise-matrix-preference-ranked-pairs-cardinal-pairwise</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby Pereira]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:24:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Condorcet winner vs Smith set vs pairwise winner(s)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks, makes sense, that is what I thought regarding the term Copeland winner.</p>
<p dir="auto">I admit I find it odd that, given how important Condorcet and the emphasis on pairwise wins is in voting theory, that this simple concept (candidates with the most pairwise wins, whether singular or multiple candidates) doesn't have a commonly used term or terms to refer to it.</p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/131/condorcet-winner-vs-smith-set-vs-pairwise-winner-s</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/131/condorcet-winner-vs-smith-set-vs-pairwise-winner-s</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 19:56:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Limits of &quot;Ranked-Choice&quot; Voting]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://electionscience.org/voting-methods/runoff-election-the-limits-of-ranked-choice-voting/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://electionscience.org/voting-methods/runoff-election-the-limits-of-ranked-choice-voting/</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/52/the-limits-of-ranked-choice-voting</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/52/the-limits-of-ranked-choice-voting</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Waugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:27:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Equal Vote]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.equal.vote/theequalvote" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.equal.vote/theequalvote</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/51/the-equal-vote</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/51/the-equal-vote</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Waugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:19:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Duverger&#x27;s Law &amp; Ingroup Bias]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Video 9:29<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1v8zK39MIY" rel="nofollow ugc"><i class="fa fa-youtube"></i> Youtube Video</a></p><div class="js-lazyYT lazyYT-container" data-youtube-id="K1v8zK39MIY" data-width="640" data-height="360" data-parameters style="width:640px;padding-bottom:360px">
 <div class="ytp-thumbnail lazyYT-image-loaded" style="background-image:url(&quot;https://i.ytimg.com/vi/K1v8zK39MIY/hqdefault.jpg&quot;)">
  <button class="ytp-large-play-button ytp-button" tabindex="23" aria-live="assertive" style="transform:scale(0.85)" onclick="$(this).lazyYT(this);return false;">
   <svg height="100%" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 68 48" width="100%">
    <path class="ytp-large-play-button-bg" d="m .66,37.62 c 0,0 .66,4.70 2.70,6.77 2.58,2.71 5.98,2.63 7.49,2.91 5.43,.52 23.10,.68 23.12,.68 .00,-1.3e-5 14.29,-0.02 23.81,-0.71 1.32,-0.15 4.22,-0.17 6.81,-2.89 2.03,-2.07 2.70,-6.77 2.70,-6.77 0,0 .67,-5.52 .67,-11.04 l 0,-5.17 c 0,-5.52 -0.67,-11.04 -0.67,-11.04 0,0 -0.66,-4.70 -2.70,-6.77 C 62.03,.86 59.13,.84 57.80,.69 48.28,0 34.00,0 34.00,0 33.97,0 19.69,0 10.18,.69 8.85,.84 5.95,.86 3.36,3.58 1.32,5.65 .66,10.35 .66,10.35 c 0,0 -0.55,4.50 -0.66,9.45 l 0,8.36 c .10,4.94 .66,9.45 .66,9.45 z" fill="#1f1f1e" fill-opacity="0.9">
    </path>
    <path d="m 26.96,13.67 18.37,9.62 -18.37,9.55 -0.00,-19.17 z" fill="#fff">
    </path>
    <path d="M 45.02,23.46 45.32,23.28 26.96,13.67 43.32,24.34 45.02,23.46 z" fill="#ccc">
    </path>
   </svg>
  </button>
 </div>
</div><p></p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/49/duverger-s-law-ingroup-bias</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/49/duverger-s-law-ingroup-bias</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Waugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:17:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Finding Common Ground]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.smartvotesim.com/commonground/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.smartvotesim.com/commonground/</a></p>
]]></description><link>http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/48/finding-common-ground</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/48/finding-common-ground</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Waugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:05:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>